Empathic Rationalist
Jim Borowski  |  by empathicrationalist.blogspot.com. All rights reserved. 17.07 | 4:19

RALLY ‘ROUND THE HOOK!
It was a bad week for one of the two politicians from my law school class, but a good week for the other. On the negative side of the ledger we have the politician with what they call “name recognition.

Some know him as the most effective government regulator of our time; others as the sitting Governor of New York. I know him simply as the latest idiot who endorsed Hillary Clinton for President.
OK, OK.

Cheap shot. I admit it. The fact is that I have a ton of respect for Elliot Spitzer.

First of all, his wife’s great. She also went to law school with us and was surely one of the most impressive women, in all respects, on campus. Secondly, when he was Attorney General of New York, Spitzer seemed to get an incredible amount of results in reining in corporate malfeasance.

Some called him a showboater, but I suspect that was based on jealousy. The guy got the job done over and over again and managed to handle himself with dignity in the process.
I can’t say I’ve followed his career as Governor quite as closely as his regulatory career, but I was thrilled when he honored his campaign promise to support gay marriage.

Apparently, he has no Presidential ambitions, which is usually a good thing for a politician.
So, what’s a nice boy like that doing endorsing a woman like Hillary? Can we attribute it to the fact that they’re both New Yorkers?

Ah, well, she’s not really a New Yorker. And even if she were, so what? With other more charismatic, more honest and equally capable candidates around, her place of residence should hardly be enough to earn his support.


Do you think Spitzer likes her vote in favor of a law banning flag burning? Or her support for the war in Iraq? Or her refusal to apologize for that vote?

Or her shameless excuse that others hoodwinked her about our military intelligence? Or her ability to polarize the nation like no other politician today (save those in the Administration)?
I know.

Maybe he just thinks it would be really cool for our democracy to see the same two families control the White House for forty or fifty years. What do you think – Chelsea in ‘16! Jenna in ’24!

Jeb Jr. in ’32! Irving Lewinsky-Clinton in ’40!

Is that what you want, Elliot?
Let’s face it, Governor, you’re no Steve Novick. Loyal readers of this blog should recognize that name, though it’s not exactly widely known.

Hopefully, this soon will change.
Roughly one month ago, Novick declared himself a candidate for the seat in the United States Senate currently held by Oregon Republican Gordon Smith. Smith is one of those blue state Republicans whose raison d’etre appears to be to make sure the Congress can never enact progressive legislation.

How a state like Oregon keeps electing a guy like this is beyond me. Presumably, he promises to bring home the bacon and not make waves, and in a society where most people have become cynical about the potential of an active government, maybe he has indeed found the winning formula.
Given the vulnerability of the GOP in ’08, it has been widely rumored that Smith’s seat is vulnerable.

And yet, in the past couple of weeks, one potential challenger after another has dropped by the wayside. We already knew that the Democratic Governor of Oregon has said that he wouldn’t run. But what we didn’t know is that every single Oregon Democrat in the U.

S. Congress would pull out of the race as well. So that leaves only one challenger of note: Mr.

Novick.
Who exactly is he? You can read a bit about him in the following link.

That’s an article Novick wrote about Gordon Smith back before Novick threw his hat in the ring. Read it and you’ll see what prompted Novick to challenge Smith, but you’ll also learn a few salient facts about the challenger.
(1) He’s 44 years of age.


(2) He comes from a relatively poor family. I don't mean poor for a politician (that's another word for upper middle-class); I mean poor compared to most of us.
(3) Because he’s so committed to working for the public interest, he’s not taken the many opportunities he's had to feather his own nest.

This man, in short, is the Platonic Form of the non sell out.
(4) He's a policy wonk’s policy wonk. He can rattle off facts and figures about economics and politics the way Paris Hilton could talk about shoes or Mel Gibson about Jews.



(5) He isn’t interested in hearing himself talk; he’s impassioned about specific causes. Above all else, he fights like a Banshee for the economic interests of the average worker. He’s also a fervent environmentalist.

And needless to say, whereas Gordon Smith was supporting the adventure in Iraq for years, Novick was a critic from the start.
(6) That said, Novick is not a knee jerk liberal. I have often been struck by the independence of his positions.

Apparently, he thinks the issues through and listens to his own counsel, rather than following the political winds.
(7) He started law school at age 18, having skipped high school altogether. You see, where he lived in Cottage Grove, Oregon, the high school was closed for a while, so he had no choice but go straight on to college at age 14.

(8) At Harvard Law School, he was four or five years younger than most of our classmates but significantly more articulate and intelligent. Despite being outspoken, he had no enemies there and plenty of fans.
(9) He is 4’ 8” and has a metallic hook for a left arm.

In fact, his own website touts himself as “the fighter with the hard left hook.” But unlike many others who style themselves “fighters,” his personality is not pugnacious. To know him is to understand that he is a kind and generous person – and would, no doubt, be warmer to his “enemies” than many politicians are to their friends.


(10) He was a successful litigator for the U.S. Department of Justice, having served as lead counsel in the Love Canal case that netted the government more than $100 million.


(11) He has worked for a number of political campaigns and has been active in fights centered on specific legislative initiatives.
(12) Until now, he has been known not as a professional “politician,” but rather as an “activist.” That’s another word for someone who fights political battles because they actually care, rather than because of their nice hair (see, e.

g., Gordon Smith) and “electability.”
(13) He is plainspoken, has a great sense of humor, and directs his funniest barbs at himself.


(14) He is not the reincarnation of Paul Wellstone. We know that because there was a time when both men were alive. But he is the closest thing this species has to a living Paul Wellstone.


So, are you intrigued? If you’re not, either I’ve failed miserably in explaining what sets this guy apart or you must lack a pulse. Honestly, the real reason Novick must win has nothing to do with the Soporific Mr.

Smith. Even if Oregon didn’t have an empty suit for a Senator, it would still have to find a place in D.C.

for Steve Novick.
We desperately need men and women like Novick to come to Washington, bring their affability and sense of humor, and then speak the truth first and read the polls later. Perhaps it is precisely because of his disabilities that Novick is allowed to say what he’s really thinking without worrying about petty schmucks coming down on him swiftly and mercilessly.

Just Google “Steve Novick + Senate” and read what’s being said about him in the blogs. Oh, you’ll find the occasional snipe (“He looks like a villain in a Mike Myers movie” is my personal favorite, and one that would surely get a laugh from Novick himself), but for the most part, the Oregonians seem to be warming up to the man pretty well. I think they recognize that if ever there were someone who represents what Oregon is supposed to stand for – down-to-earth, fun-loving, independent, environmentally-conscious – that person is Steve Novick.


But enough about Novick. Let’s talk about you. Are you prepared to read about this guy?

You obviously have a computer, that’s the place to start. There are all sorts of info on the web about him. And surely, even if you don’t live in the great state of Oregon, you must know people who do.

Spread the word, my friends. Don’t sit on the sidelines lamenting all the problems in the world. Bring Steve Novick to Washington!

Make it happen. Then watch as he tells truth to power. Who knows, if he can win and if, perchance, there are other Novick’s out there in the country (perhaps a 7 footer who started Yale Law School at age 17), maybe we can actually regain some faith in our Government.


Read more on by empathicrationalist.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Law School, Steve Novick, Gordon Smith, Paul Wellstone, Law School At, School At, But i, New York
Related news
  • People: July 11 : People : Knoxville News Sentinel
    Penny Ditch

    Share and Enjoy [?] Maybe it was the pink doughnut. Maybe it was the clever homemade video or small-town charm. Maybe Homer just figured it was time to go green...

  • Vote: Is this Mel Gibson? Vote now
    John Hitch

    IS this an anonymous face in the crowd, or is it really Australia's most successful actor-director in disguise, trying to keep a very low profile? Hollywood star and producer Mel Gibson was visiting the Mexican state capital of Sonora for the Catholic co...

  • An Angry White Guy in Chicago: August 1995: The Ugly American
    Dwayne Jenkings

    ; Mel Gibson wins the Oscar for ; Brad Pitt shows he can act in Terry Gilliam's In July an interviewer from the Glasgow Herald calls me...

  • 2005-05-15
    Ronaldinho

    Oh, that's (Frank) Rich: A "queer" eye for the homophobic conservative guys Although his weekly columns in the Times occasionally degenerate into repetition, one-sidedness, and an excessive effort to drive a point home (last year's columns on Mel Gibson...

  • We Were Soldiers
    Hotty Miss

    This film isn't exactly haunting but a day later it is still bouncing around in my head. I was thrown at first by this film...

Post comments
Name
Place
9 + 1 =
Comments