Cloudy Thinking Blog Archive Nintendo, a Profitable Number Three in Video Games
Ram Stone  |  by blog.eronj.com. All rights reserved. 4.04 | 17:21

in The New Yorker about Nintendo, number three behind Sony and Microsoft in video games, but highly profitable.
You might expect, then, that Nintendo would be struggling to stay afloat. After all, the prevailing wisdom is that companies need to be market leaders, or face disaster.

This approach was famously institutionalized by Jack Welch, who, when he took over as C.E.O.

of G.E., laid down a rule that he described as a “central idea” of his tenure: the company would quit any business in which it was not No.

1 or No. 2. The lesson that people took away from this was clear—third place is for losers.


“First prize is a Cadillac Eldorado,” Alec Baldwin’s character says in the film “Glengarry Glen Ross.” “Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you’re fired.


Nintendo, though, has not just survived out of the spotlight; it has thrived. It has five billion dollars in the bank from years of solid profits, and this past year, though it spent heavily on the launch of the Wii, it made close to a billion dollars in profit and saw its stock price rise by sixty-five per cent. Sony’s game division, by contrast, barely eked out a profit and Microsoft’s reportedly lost money.

Who knew bringing up the rear could be so lucrative?
And because Nintendo sells many more of its own games than Sony and Microsoft do, its profit margins are higher, too.
Arguably, Nintendo has thrived not despite its fall from the top but because of it.

The point is that business is not a sporting event. Victory for one company doesn’t mean defeat for everyone else. Markets today are so big—the global video-game market is now close to thirty billion dollars—that companies can profit even when they’re not on top, as long as they aren’t desperately trying to get there.


The key is to play to your strengths while recognizing your limitations. Nintendo knew that it could not compete with Microsoft and Sony in the quest to build the ultimate home-entertainment device. So it decided, with the Wii, to play a different game entirely.


Some pundits are now speculating, ironically, that the simplicity of the Wii may make it a huge hit. Nintendo wouldn’t complain if that happened. But, in the meantime, third prize is looking a lot better than steak knives.

on Tuesday, November 28th, 2006 at 6:37 am and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed. You must be to post a comment.

Read more on by blog.eronj.com. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Number Three, Video Games
Related news
  • Still Bearish on "Bully" Maker [Fool.com] March 13, 2007
    Franky Micklestone

    Are you planning any home improvements in 2007? It's no surprise that the Grand Theft Auto franchise once again helped out Take-Two Interactive (Nasdaq: ) , which reported earnings for its fiscal first quarter yesterday...

  • Take-Two shareholders win control, oust CEO
    Hotty Miss

    Take-Two shareholders win control, oust CEO Dissident shareholders led by OppenheimerFunds succeed in taking control of the video game maker, booting CEO Eibeler; new chairman rules out job cuts in near term...

  • Xbox 360 Review: Def Jam Icon
    Jill Stone

    When the most entertaining part about having a new video game spinning in your Xbox 360, in this case Electronic Art rsquo;s newly released Def Jam Icon , is watching your wife take repeated stabs at playing it - that game might not be worth the hefty pr...

  • Ryan A.
    Jim Borowski

    Retail chain this morning had its quarterly conference call and companies Nintendo, , and were somehow included in the discussion...

  • Papa Dont Preach
    Peja Stojakovic

    Papa, Don't Preach (or the Fallacy of Fallaci) by Naeem Mohaiemen Sometimes it's good to get behind the news cycle...

Post comments
Name
Place
9 + 1 =
Comments