February 19th, 2007 at 11:30 by Stuart Heritage Daniel Radcliffe can t do right for doing wrong - and by that we mean that the Harry Potter film studio is angry about Daniel Radcliffe taking all his clothes off and stabbing some horses in the eye in worship of a mental horse-god in front of everyone. Or that s what we thought anyway - but all reports of Warner Bros getting narked because Harry Potter keeps getting naked in the new run of have been quickly denied by Warner Bros itself. In fact, Warner Bros are so in-tune to the hype and hysteria surrounding naked Harry Potter that it s doing all it can to insert footage of Daniel Radcliffe s naked penis into all the old films for a new special edition DVD boxset - yes, even the one where he was an 11-year-old boy, the perverts.
Unless we re wrong and, since we just made that last bit up, we suspect we are. You may not have realised it, but on Friday night Harry Potter got his cock out in front of an audience for the very first time, because it marked the first preview of - or to use its more common name. And anyone thinking that Daniel Radcliffe s premiere in would be commemorated by some surreptitious photos of a 17-year-old boy s genitalia getting zapped around the internet will be sorely disappointed - so far, only the theatre audience has got to see Daniel Radcliffe naked.
But don t worry, you vaguely paedophilic creepoids are not the only ones to be disappointed by naked Daniel Radcliffe - at the weekend it was being rumoured that Warner Bros, the movie studio that makes the Harry Potter films, was upset that its carefully crafted Harry Potter kisses a girl for the very first time PR campaign for the forthcoming movie has been utterly undermined by the less carefully crafted Harry Potter gets naked, stabs several horses in the eye with a metal spike, worships an invented horse-god and shags a girl (but you don t see it going in) PR campaign that was backed up with pictures of Daniel Radcliffe sort of naked.