SOMEONE needs to win these format wars already. $1200 for a burner? WTF?
Does anyone remember how much DVD burners were when they came out? I dont remember them being over $1k, but then again, I was pretty young.
Then again, my memory is a sieve.
its almost been a year, and they are still scarce.
HD DVD should just fold.
.. for less then $1,200 The ONLY advantage some HD DVD backers claimed was that it was slightly less expensive.
.. well.
.. now this just blew that out of the water, you waste time combining these two formats.
Just put out a 4X blu-ray drive and be done with it! You're only encouraging Universal! They need a clear message, everyone else is backing Blu-ray, we'll wait for Back to the Future.
...
we've got Star Wars! Anyway, HD burners are out there, its just they're slim, 1X and only single layer (15GB), so a pretty big waste as well. Blu-ray is about to launch a SLOT LOAD BD slimline drive, that will take over the market for sure.
...
.. I remember my office got one, and I recall it costing in the ballpark of $1000 (I think it was a model made by Pinnacle Micro).
Like others have said, LG is just encouraging a long format war. BD drives are droping in price almost monthly now, by the end of the year HD DVD will loose what little advantage it has right now.
HD-DVD still wins in that department. Even at 1080p over HDMI, I'm very disappointed in Blu-ray. I'm not even sure why these minimal upgrades are even necessary at this point, when DVD is just fine.
Upscaling does a pretty good job nowadays. I don't know about you, but the ability to see women's facial hair on closeups isn't exactly my idea of enjoying a movie.
I'm sure this will follow a similar path.
" Seriously, why pay $1,200 for a dual format burner when I can pick up a Blu-ray burner (the ever-increasing fore-runner) for $600?
That does effect the quality of the image. This will change soon as Sony and a couple others are now releasing MPEG4 video that is discernibly better. I can assure you in my own experience, regardless of codec, the transfer to digital format also factors into the quality drastically.
I've seen some that look like an up-sampled 480p and others that are as crisp and clear as anything I've seen.
. when it says 6x-10x for the usual dvd formats, does this include hd dvd? does this mean normal dvd write times are 6x for a $1,200 buner?
?? I don't see what the fuss of 1200 bucks for a BDVD/HDDVD player/burner.
At retail it seems that most players go for that kind of cash anyways...
Especially combo drives...
at least thats what it seems like here in Canada. I agree with one of the posts above though..
. I think the seven or so format logos are old. Also HD-DVD is not all that bad.
Sure there isn't much studio support for it, but thats not its fault. Sony has it's greedy hands in everything now lol. Also HD-DVD is also supported by Warner Bros.
.. not just Universal.
Also HD-DVD players are a little cheaper too...
For example the 360's add on is only 200 bucks.
.. I mean, if this drive was about the same price as a Blu-ray-only Drive I don't mind buying it but, I sure as hell ain't paying an extra $300-$400 just to help those losers at Toshiba to slow down progression of Technology with their low-capacity discs.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password.
To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments.
Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted no need to use p or br tags.