This week, the defeat-retreat-surrender Democrats came up with a brand new way to surrender to Islamic militant groups. Kudos to the strategists in the Democratic Party! The Democrats proposal: Surrender in increments.
Brilliant! (I m sure there were lots of caffeinated late-night sessions by junior staffers to come up with this idea.) Congressional Democrats said yesterday that they ll allow President Bush to fight the war against terrorism until July of this year, but after that they want U.
S. troops to start handing over greater pieces of Iraq to al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups. This is actually an improvement over the Democrats pre-election strategy, which, you ll recall, centered on redeploying U.
S. troops to Okinawa. So now it s time for the anti-war Democrats to get a new Extreme Makeover, Appeasement Edition.
After months of focus groups, polling and work with image consultants, the anti-war crackpots are unveiling their brand new "pro-troop" style, complete with the claim that it is anti-war liberals who speak for the "the troops." They ve launched a front-group, , which is really nothing more than the public face for MoveOn.org, the left-wing Center for American Progress and more of George Soros money.
VoteVets last year targeted vulnerable Republicans like Sen. George Allen in their quest to hand control of Congress over to the Democrats. One of the front men for VoteVets is Gen.
Paul D. Eaton, a savage partisan attack dog who was tapped by the anti-war movement to help lead the campaign that eventually forced out Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. An appearance on the liberal "Real Time with Bill Maher" show reveals Eaton s white-hot, deranged hatred for the Republican Party and his great willingness to serve as a partisan hack for the Democrat Party.
And with the arrival of a Democratic controlled Congress, thank God, on 7 November, we ve got a chance to unsort and to figure out how to get out from under this.
News RSS