bottle? In her 2005 book Rebels on the Backlot, Sharon Waxman wrote about Thomas Anderson, Steven Soderbergh and Spike Jonze. Her thesis was that in films such as Se7en, Pulp Fiction and Magnolia, they ldquo;created a new cinematic language, recast audience expectations, and surprised us ndash; and one with traditional narrative form, fiddled with the film stock, and ushered in The key year for the new generation was 1999, when, as the web magazine Salon put it, ldquo;the indie wave crashed onto the beach of American culture with tremendous force rdquo;.
Magnolia, Three Kings, Being John Malkovich and Fight Club were released that year, as were American Beauty, Election, The Matrix Nearly a decade later, however, it rsquo;s clear that most of the directors Waxman the 1970s: Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, Hal Ashby and Robert Altman, directors to whom they were, Waxman said, ldquo;nothing if not obvious in recent weeks, with the release of long-awaited films by Fincher and Tarantino. Fincher rsquo;s Zodiac, with Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Ruffalo and Robert Downey Jr, tells the true story of the hunt for the so-called Zodiac serial killer, who terrorised San Francisco and the Bay Area in the 1960s and 1970s. (It will be the closing-night film at Cannes, and opens in the UK next week.
) Although the film was touted as the most personal work from Fincher since Fight Club, and is his first movie since 2002 rsquo;s Panic Room, it has taken just $32m so far, nowhere near enough to recoup its $75m-plus budget. Although Zodiac is likely to fare better in Europe, even Fincher ldquo;It rsquo;s just people talking, rdquo; he said, ldquo;and it rsquo;s hard to make an audience realise they have to be paying attention. rdquo; Fincher seems to have fallen enjoy too much adulation.
He refused to listen to studio executives who wanted him to make the film more accessible, and infuriated the actors ndash; shots, as he fretted about the tiniest details. He ended up filming for 115 days and shooting enough footage for two films. Such pettifogging criticisms don rsquo;t bother Fincher.
ldquo;I think perfectionism has gotten a bad rap, rdquo; he said. Tarantino rsquo;s latest, Grindhouse, a double-bill homage to 1970s exploitation movies, has also been a disappointment since it opened a month ago in America, taking just $20m. The producers, Harvey and Bob Weinstein, will have to eat a substantial loss.
Again, hubris seems to be responsible for once so instinctively in tune with. Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez, director of the other half of the bill, were supposed to make two 60-minute movies, costing a total of $40m, to be released last December. But with nobody apparently able to control the directors, the films ballooned out of control, ending up at 85 minutes each and, the trade paper Variety It didn rsquo;t help, according to Variety, that Rodriguez fell in love with his leading lady, Rose McGowan, during the shoot.
He has denied that the romance for a month. The Weinsteins tried desperately to convince Tarantino and Rodriguez to let them release the films separately, but the directors refused, believing only they knew what the audience wanted. The films will The more these directors have been indulged, the worse their behaviour has grown.
David O Russell hasn rsquo;t released a film since the disastrous, But he has been the subject of a viral video, shot on the set of the movie, Lily Tomlin, screaming unbelievable obscenities at her, rushing out of the room, storming back in, kicking over a rubbish bin and furiously sweeping Leaked by someone on the film, the video has cemented Russell rsquo;s reputation for being close to insane on his sets. He has a propensity for grabbing his stars rsquo; genitalia when he is excited, and even got into a fist fight with George Clooney on the set of Three Kings, when the actor felt he was being abusive to crew members. ldquo;Why don rsquo;t you just worry about your f***ed-up act?
rdquo; Russell screamed at Clooney when he intervened. ldquo;You rsquo;re being a d***. You want to hit me?
You want to hit me? Come on, pussy, hit me. rdquo; Of the other ldquo;rebel rdquo; directors profiled by Waxman, both Anderson and Jonze have had trouble with their creative mojo.
Anderson rsquo;s most recent movie was the disappointing Punch-Drunk Love, in 2002, which made just $18m in the USA. His next film, There Will Be Blood, about the turn-of-the-century oil business, won rsquo;t be released until the end of the year. That rsquo;s a five-year Jonze rsquo;s most recent film, Adaptation, was released in 2002.
His adaptation of until next year. That rsquo;s a six-year gap, for a director who is only 37. Beyond the lack of productivity and the box-office failures, there is 1970s whom they once imagined they might emulate.
With few exceptions, they aren rsquo;t making films about the great issues of the day. Where is this generation rsquo;s Apocalypse Now, Coming Home or The Deer Hunter? One of the to say about America today.
Tarantino and Rodriguez rsquo;s Grindhouse films and with the issues that should concern us all, and them. ldquo;The millennium, rdquo; she says. ldquo;Perhaps Tarantino, child of the video culture, feels at a loss when faced with the war in Iraq and global terrorism.
rdquo; Just wanted to say -- ZODIAC is a masterpiece. That it didn't make money indicates nothing about its quality. Saying that it feels so unimportant because it has nothing at all to say about America today is like saying that THE GODFATHER or RAGING BULL are unimportant for having nothing to say about America in the 70s or 80s.
That's ridiculous. I fully agree that the promising new American directors of the 90s have been, to a large extent, unprolific and unambitious. But ZODIAC is a jewel.
If they take their time, it's for a damn good reason. The real question is, where is the next crop of movie-makers? Of those younger than Paul Thomas Anderson, only David Gordon Green is making great movies.
Again, these directors are making movies that were just as, if not more financially successful than their '99 movies. Remember, 'Fight Club' flopped, 'Magnolia' flopped, 'Election' flopped, 'Three Kings' flopped, 'Being John Malkovich' was a tiny, tiny movie. Financial success has forever eluded these folks, but they still make great movies, meaning they haven't gone anywhere.
To look at the real world, even past worlds, takes more than young directors nano-second attention spans.
It's no wonder that film content suffers with these uber-directors appear unbalanced, undereducated, unaffected by serious issues that affect us all. When they do focus it seems to be on drugs, sex, and violence. Well, that may be part of the real world, but we don't need to wallow in it.
Take a risk: Inspire us!
News RSS